Criteria
|
4 points
|
3 points
|
2 points
|
1 points
|
Focus on the task
25%
|
Stays on
task all the time without reminders.
|
Stays on
task most of the time. Group members can count on this person.
|
Stays on
task some of the time. Group
members
must
sometimes
remind
this
person
to do the
work.
|
Hardly
ever stays on task.
Lets
others do the work.
|
Work Habits
25%
|
Completes assigned all tasks and does not depend on others to do
the work.
|
Completes most assigned tasks.
|
Does not
follow through
on most tasks
and sometimes
counts on others
to do the work
|
Does not complete tasks.
Depends on
others to do all
of the work.
|
Group interaction
50%
|
Respectfully listens,
discusses, asks questions and helps
direct the group in solving problems or completing the tasks.
Shares useful ideas for discussions.
All information
fits the group’s
goals
|
Respectfully listens,
discusses and
asks questions.
Usually provides useful information and ideas for discussion.
|
Has trouble listening with respect, and
takes over discussions
without letting
other people
have a turn. Sometimes does not interact with the group.
Sometimes
provides useful
information
and ideas for discussion.
|
Does not listen with
respect, argues
with teammates,
and does not consider other ideas. Blocks
group from Reaching agreement.
Almost never provides useful information or ideas for discussion.
|
Monday, May 28, 2012
Teamwork and Cooperation Rubric – FOR SCIENCE TEAM ACTIVITY
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Science Class Performance Rubric
90% +
|
80% +
|
70% +
|
60% +
|
Less than 60%
|
Exemplary
Student presents a clear, specific understanding of the topic .
All notes, assignments and labs required are completed on time, are extremely
well organized and questions are answered accurately. High interest and
excitement have lead the student to an investigation that reaches far beyond
the requirements. Student has read related materials and has used many
sources of information for reports and or experiments. The student has used
his/her new knowledge when participating in all oral discussions. Student
makes connections between past and present, cause-effect relationships,
willingness to change beliefs if necessary, and results in the ability to
make a prediction. The students notes, labs, debates and assignments
|
Strong
Student presents a clear, specific understanding of the topic.
High interest and excitement leads the student to an investigation that
reaches beyond requirements. All notes, assignments and labs required are
completed on time, are very well organized and questions are answered
accurately. The student has used as more resources than required; and
demonstrates new knowledge both orally and in written work and uses this
knowledge in his/her assignments and oral participation. New knowledge is
evident when student shows connections between past and present or
cause-effect relationships. Student notes, labs, debates and assignments are
clearly organized, carefully done, and often goes beyond teacher
expectations. All tests are beyond the standard level of achievement.
|
Capable
Student meets assignment expectations. The student demonstrates
new knowledge learned in oral participation and or written tasks. The work is
well organized and complete. The student understood the assignments. He/she
used the number of resources required; and organized information in all
notes, assignments, debates and labs. All notes, assignments and labs are
complete, carefully done and the student meets the requirements and
expectations. All tests meet the standard level of achievement.
|
Developing
Student knowledge of the topic is partly understood, but not
complete. The assignments, notes and labs are occasionally incomplete and
could be organized better . Some resources have been used, but it is not
clear what the student understood. Some of the information included by the
student was not important to the topic Student does most what is required,
but nothing more. Some of the work may not be finished. Tasks are not
carefully done and the information from the resources is not used. Test
results often fall below the standard level of achievement.
|
Limited
Student use of the topic is not shown. Steps through the process
were not followed. Notes, assignments and labs lack neatness, organization,
detail and evidence of new knowledge. Work does not meet requirements. Parts
are missing. Participation is weak, or student is often not participating.
Labs, tests and assignments are poorly done and fall well behind the standard
level of achievement. Overall, the student has failed to grasp new concepts
covered in the topic.
|
Rubric for Science Logs and Journal Writing
Rubric for Science Logs
and Journal Writing
|
||
Area of Product
|
Criteria
|
Rating
|
Daily entries
|
·
Regular daily entries
·
Entries 90% of the time
·
Entries 80% of the time
·
Entries less than 80% of the time
|
4
3
2
1
|
Use of scientific language
|
·
Consistent, accurate usage of terms
·
Adequate usage of scientific terms
·
Occasional use with few errors
·
No terms or frequent errors in usage
|
4
3
2
1
|
Application to the real world
|
·
Able to apply learning
·
Usually finds practical application
·
Occasionally relates to real life skills
·
No practical application
|
4
3
2
1
|
Concept understanding
|
·
Shows understanding of key concepts
·
Usually demonstrates understanding
·
Inadequately demonstrates understanding
·
Poor understanding of concepts
|
4
3
2
1
|
Clarity of thought
|
·
Well organized
·
Adequate organization
·
Limited organization
·
Poor organization
|
4
3
2
1
|
Rubric – Conducting a Science Investigation
Category
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Experiments
|
Hypothesized relationship between the
variables and the predicted results is clear and reasonable based on what has
been studied.
|
Hypothesized relationship between the
variables and the predicted results is reasonable based on general knowledge
of observations
|
Hypothesized relationship between the
variables and the predicted results has been stated, but appears to be based
on flawed logic.
|
No hypothesis has been stated.
|
Procedures
|
Procedures are listed in clear steps.
|
Procedures are listed but are not in a
logical order or are difficult to follow.
|
Procedures do not accurately list the steps
of the experiment.
|
No procedures.
|
Calculations
|
All calculations are shown and the results
are correct and labeled appropriately.
|
Some calculations are shown and the results
are correct and labeled appropriately
|
Some calculations are shown and the results
are labeled appropriately.
|
No calculations are shown OR results are
inaccurate or mislabeled.
|
Summary
|
Summary describes the skills learned, the
information learned and some future applications to real life
situations.
|
Summary describes the information learned
and a possible application to real
life situation
|
Summary describes the information
learned.
|
No summary is written.
|
Conclusion
|
Conclusions includes whether the findings
supported the hypothesis, possible sources of error, and what was learned
from the experiment.
|
Conclusion includes whether the findings
supported the hypothesis and what was learned from the experiment.
|
Conclusion includes what was learned from
the experiment.
|
No conclusion was included in the report OR
shows little effort and reflection.
|
Portfolio Evaluation Rubric
|
Portfolio Evaluation Rubric
|
|||
Student Name:
|
Score:
|
|||
Category
|
Scoring
Criteria
|
Max
Points
|
Student
Evaluation
|
Teacher
Evaluation
|
Portfolio Presentation
|
The
student name, year and section, name of
teacher, and the grading period are clearly marked on the outside or
cover page of the portfolio
|
5
|
|
|
The
portfolio is organized from front to back, with the most recent pages at the
back (Daily pages and assignments are found together in chronological order)
|
15
|
|
|
|
All
assignments, practice problems, exercises, quizzes, chapter or unit tests for
the grading period have been complied and are found in the portfolio
|
15
|
|
|
|
All
entries in the portfolio are either neatly written in ink or typed and
printed
|
10
|
|
|
|
The
neatness of the portfolio indicates that the student takes pride in their
work and desires to be successful in class. (Examples: all entries are
carefully written using the same color pen, no pages are torn or dirty, no
“spiral notebook” pages are used, and no pages have drawings or marks
unrelated to the assignment.)
|
10
|
|
|
|
Daily Comments
|
Each
day of class is clearly identified with a heading: such as “Learning
Insights, Monday – June 20, 2005”
|
45
|
|
|
Rubric For Conducting Science Activity
Rubric For Conducting Science
Activity
Criteria
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Set-up
and Equipment Care
25%
|
Equipments are accurately
placed. All necessary supplies on hand. Very neat and organized
|
Set-up of equipment is
generally accurate with 1 or 2 small details that need refinement. All
necessary supplies on hand
|
Set-up of equipment is
generally workable with several details that need refinement. Some necessary
supplies must be searched out
|
Set-up of equipment is
not accurate; help is required with several major details. Many necessary
supplies must found in the lab set-up
|
Following
Procedure
25%
|
Demonstrates very
good knowledge of the lab procedures. Thoroughly and carefully follows each
step before moving on to next step
|
Demonstrates good knowledge
of the lab procedures. Seek help from teacher from time to time. Works to
follow each step before moving on to the next step
|
Demonstrates general knowledge of lab procedures.
Requires help from teacher with some steps in procedures
|
Lacks the appropriate knowledge of the lab
procedures. Often requires help from the teacher to even complete basic
procedures
|
Data
Collection
20%
|
Measurements are both
accurate and precise
Observations
are very
thorough.
Work is neat and
organized.
Includes
appropriate
symbols, units
and
significant digits
|
Measurements are mostly accurate Observations are
generally complete Work is organized Only 2 or 3 minor errors using symbols,
units and significant digits
|
Measurements are somewhat inaccurate and very imprecise Observations
are incomplete or recorded in a confusing way There are 3 or more minor errors
using symbols, units and significant digits or 2 major errors
|
Measurements are incomplete, inaccurate and
imprecise Observations are incomplete or not included Symbols, units and
significant figures are not included.
|
Safety
15%
|
Proper safety
precautions are consistently used. Consistently thinks ahead to ensure safety
|
Proper safety precautions are generally used May
need to be reminded once during the lab
|
Proper safety precautions are often missed. Needs
to be reminded more than once during the lab
|
Proper safety precautions areconsistently missed
Needs to be reminded often during the lab.
|
Clean-up
15%
|
Consistently uses proper clean-up procedures.
Station always left neat and clean
|
Proper clean-up procedures
generally used May need some help on occasion to
complete tasks Station generally left clean
|
Needs to be reminded more than once during the
lab to use proper clean-up procedures 1 or 2 items left at station or not
cleaned
|
Proper clean-up procedures are seldom used Often
requires help to complete clean-up 3 or more items left at station or station
not cleaned
|
Resource: by Owen Pena @ http://myphysicswebschool.blogspot.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)